SNSBI Twenty-fourth Spring Conference – 27-29 March 2015

The SNSBI 2015 spring conference was held at the University of East Anglia in conjunction with the Centre of East Anglian Studies (CEAS).

The theme of the meeting was East Anglian places and people. The programme and abstracts are below, and in those cases where the author has given permission, the title is a link to a pdf copy of the slides. Some feedback has been: Thanks very much for such an enjoyable and useful conferenceMany thanks for a wonderful and inspiring conferenceThanks again to both of you for your fantastic work on the Norwich conference. It was an excellent programme, and everything went surprisingly smoothlyThank you for a great conference, it was really great to see Norwich and to hear all the interesting talks givenExcellent conferenceThank you for organising a splendid programmeThank you for inviting me – I enjoyed it immenselyThanks for an excellent conferencecongratulations on an excellent, well-organized, and enjoyable conference.

Programme

Friday 27 March

  • 2000 Tom Williamson (UEA): Place-names and the East Anglian landscape: problems and possibilities

Saturday 28 March

Session 2: English toponymy

  • 0900 Keith Briggs: Some Suffolk place-name puzzles
  • 0930 Susan Kilby (University of Leicester): The secret life of the fields: extraordinary ordinary landscapes
  • 1000 Robert Briggs (University of Nottingham): -ingas and -ingaham place-names in Surrey

Session 3: Toponymy elsewhere

Session 4: East Anglian personal names

  • 1400 Patrick Hanks (UWE): East Anglian surnames
  • 1430 Paul Cullen (UWE/Nottingham): Locative surnames in East Anglia
  • 1500 Veronica Smart: The moneyers’ names of the St Edmund memorial coinage
  • 1530 Shaun Tyas: Onomastic problems connected with the study of the reign of Ecgberht of Wessex.

Session 5: Scandinavians in East Anglia

Session 6: Short project reports

Sunday 29 March

  • 0900 SNSBI Annual General Meeting

Session 7: Scandinavians in England

Session 8: Microtoponymy & landscapes

Session 9: English toponymy


Abstracts

Some Suffolk place-name puzzles

Keith Briggs

The parish names of Suffolk are mostly purely English and of well understood common types such as names with generic -ley, -ham, -ton, -ford, -worth, etc., with either an OE personal name or an adjective as specific. However, there are a surprising number of names in which the specific is either completely obscure, or has some unusual features demanding a linguistic explanation. There are also a few names apparently ancient (e.g., of Domesday date) but belonging only to farms. This talk will mainly just raise open questions about such names, with a selection from Bealings & Belstead, Bergholt, Beyton, Bulcamp, Harkstead, Hengrave, Livermere, Orwell, Purton Green, Wenhaston, and Wordwell & Worlington.

The secret life of the fields: extraordinary ordinary landscapes

Susan Kilby

Within current scholarship, field-names are predominantly considered from an etymological perspective on the one hand, and to aid in the reconstruction of the physical landscape on the other. Although problems have been noted with both approaches, researchers have struggled to find an alternative methodology. This paper seeks to address this issue by considering late medieval field-names from the world-view of the peasant, resulting in a more phenomenological application. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, and using a wide range of sources that include documents and material evidence alongside the landscape itself, a group of Northamptonshire field-names is re-interpreted using an anthropological framework that considers the landscape as a repository for folklore, myth and legend. Taking this approach, a seemingly ordinary late medieval environment is reconstructed and presented as a possible memorial to perceived historical events.

The Scottish Maidenwells

Carole Hough

In a paper read at the Society’s Falmouth conference in 2009 and subsequently published in Nomina 33 (2010), I presented a case for ‘The Name-Type Maid(en)well’ to be interpreted as a dedication to the Virgin Mary, paralleling other recurrent place-names such as Lady Well and Mary Well. I also drew attention to the geographical distribution, which appeared to be restricted to southern Britain, with none of the corpus of 21 occurrences situated further north than Lincolnshire in England. More recently, additional occurrences have come to light in Scotland, partly through work on the AHRC-funded project Scottish Toponymy in Transition at the University of Glasgow (2011-2014), and partly through the availability of the Ordnance Survey Name Books on the ScotlandsPlaces website. This paper will present a brief analysis of the Scottish corpus, and discuss the implications of the revised distribution pattern.